Re:NASA admits it doesn’t have the funding to land humans on...
by mikeash on Thursday July 13, 2017 @10:21AM
(#14761452)
I'm pretty sure the big reason Apollo was successful was that they had enough support to get the job done within that 8-year period. And, no surprise, Nixon's election heralded the end, although inertia kept it moving for a few years.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:NASA admits it doesn’t have the funding to land humans on...
by ApolloFortyNine on Thursday July 13, 2017 @11:33AM
(#14762140)
The Soviet Union pretty much quitting a year or so after the US landed on the moon is what did it.
Re:NASA admits it doesn’t have the funding to land humans on...
by gozur88 on Thursday July 13, 2017 @12:32PM
(#14762697)
But the same people were in Congress, pretty much.
The problem is the public lost interest in the moon. It's a big dusty rock with nothing much to recommend the billions we were spending to go there.