News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pell – A simple and small rich-text editor for the web by roryisok on Thursday July 13, 2017 @09:14AM (#14760936)
> Enabling your codebase to be used from the user's own browser would have a much better return in bloat-reduction, even if it meant writing more of your own code.

Not every app can be ported to the browser. For instance, if I wanted to make a local file manager (like fman) I couldn't do that in the browser. This is why native apps exist.

Re:Pell – A simple and small rich-text editor for the web by lmm on Thursday July 13, 2017 @09:51AM (#14761175)
Sure, but even for that kind of app, if you were looking to reduce the bloat then I'd look to try to cut down the runtime you were shipping (i.e. maybe you can build some stripped-down version of electron that contains only the parts you need) before trying to cut your own code, because the runtime is where most of the bloat is.
Re:Pell – A simple and small rich-text editor for the web by roryisok on Thursday July 13, 2017 @09:58AM (#14761245)
> maybe you can build some stripped-down version of electron that contains only the parts you need

if you're using electron in the first place, I think its safe to assume that re-inventing electron is not within your skillset.

Re:Pell – A simple and small rich-text editor for the web by lmm on Thursday July 13, 2017 @10:11AM (#14761379)
Build in the sense of "compile" more than in the sense of "write"; I'm not advocating reinventing it from scratch, just customizing it a little.
Re:Pell – A simple and small rich-text editor for the web by roryisok on Thursday July 13, 2017 @11:10AM (#14761923)
That would be a neat option, but I don't think its possible at the moment. you have to take all or nothing.

You raise a good point though. If they could make electron more modular it would save on a lot of that bloat everyone always complains about. I bet half the apps could make do without audio, image processing etc