Re:Bitcoin – Potential Network Disruption on July 31st
by ar0 on Thursday July 13, 2017 @03:44AM
(#14759467)
Isn't "any [money] you receive [...] may later disappear" actually pretty common with credit card chargebacks?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bitcoin – Potential Network Disruption on July 31st
by matt_wulfeck on Thursday July 13, 2017 @12:45PM
(#14762810)
This is such a silly argument. Chargebacks are for the protection of the consumer against a business. They're GREAT if you're a consumer. Why would it be in my benefit as a bitcoin user to have no recourse for fraudulent transactions?
Re:Bitcoin – Potential Network Disruption on July 31st
by GenericsMotors on Thursday July 13, 2017 @12:09PM
(#14762495)
Chargebacks usually have some form of review/dispute process as well. What's bit-coin's process for disputing the disappearance of my wallet's contents because of this fork?