News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Researchers Realized Research 2000's Daily Kos Data L... by billswift on Wednesday June 30, 2010 @02:37AM (#1474073)
One thing that has always bugged me is how can two polls give different results to effectively identical questions and both claim to have "plus or minus 3%" (or whatever) margin of error, when their results have substantially larger differences than that?
Re:How Researchers Realized Research 2000's Daily Kos Data L... by JacobAldridge on Wednesday June 30, 2010 @04:15AM (#1474216)
Keep in mind that defining a representative sample is also fraught with differences. How you you determine if someone is a likely voter (are they registered? did they vote last time? other or some combination of the above?), for example, or ensure what you believe is a representative sample of different ethnicities?

Because a sample of 200 - 1200 is used and multiplied out to represent the population as a whole, tweaks in those definitions can lead to different results for the same questions.

I definitely second the www.fivethirtyeight.com tips, as well as www.electoral-vote.com for regular outside analysis of polls and discussion of methodological differences among the various polling places.

Re:How Researchers Realized Research 2000's Daily Kos Data L... by billswift on Wednesday June 30, 2010 @01:29PM (#1475513)
I understand that - I meant my comment to be more a complaint about bogus/worthless "margins of error".
Re:How Researchers Realized Research 2000's Daily Kos Data L... by eru on Wednesday June 30, 2010 @06:02PM (#1476390)
The margin of error is often meant as one standard deviation. And for normal distributed data, only around 66% of values lie within that.
Re:How Researchers Realized Research 2000's Daily Kos Data L... by ryanpetrich on Wednesday June 30, 2010 @04:05AM (#1474201)
A slight change in wording can change how people think about their answer