Re:Unikernels are secure
by rrdharan on Monday July 10, 2017 @01:06PM
(#14737740)
> In short - this post has a hell of a click bait title but really insufficient evidence to suggest that these are truly "secure".
From the original pull request drafting this post:
> While I agree that making hyperbolical claims isn't typically good I'm not sure if it is bad here. There seem to be a tradition in unikernel land with outlandish claims in various blogposts ("Unikernels will kill containers in five years", "Unikernels are unfit for production", etc) so I wrote it with that tone in mind.
Re:Unikernels are secure
by eriknstr on Monday July 10, 2017 @07:19PM
(#14740457)
If the unikernel people keep up with the hyperbole the potential audience will learn to just ignore most posts about unikernels. Please don't use hyperbole.
From the original pull request drafting this post:
> While I agree that making hyperbolical claims isn't typically good I'm not sure if it is bad here. There seem to be a tradition in unikernel land with outlandish claims in various blogposts ("Unikernels will kill containers in five years", "Unikernels are unfit for production", etc) so I wrote it with that tone in mind.
https://github.com/Unikernel-Systems/unikernel.org/pull/45