News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IPhone 4 by ugh on Tuesday June 29, 2010 @09:31PM (#1473548)
That’s a rather serious accusation. Do you have any evidence which would point you that way?
Re:IPhone 4 by ergo98 on Tuesday June 29, 2010 @09:35PM (#1473557)
A less serious accusation is that Gruber now knows that his core readership consists of, essentially, the Apple faithful. He knows to pander to that crowd and that is how he gets paid. It's iPhone fans who feel that every Gruber observation about the iPhone is so critically important that it needs to be voted up on HN.
Re:IPhone 4 by jacobolus on Tuesday June 29, 2010 @10:34PM (#1473682)
His readership, from the frequency with which his posts make it to the front page here, seems to include the hacker news community. Do you consider yourself, or the rest of us, “essentially the Apple faithful”?

As far as I can tell the subject of his blog could be summarized as something like “high signal-to-noise and semi-technical discussion of Apple, the web, and graphic design, with occasional sports and politics related tidbits.

“The Apple faithful” as a group is quite different from “technical and semi-technical readers interested in Apple and the web”.

Re:IPhone 4 by ergo98 on Wednesday June 30, 2010 @10:38AM (#1474930)
>Do you consider yourself, or the rest of us, “essentially the Apple faithful”?

HN does have a strong Apple lean, although it has subsided quite dramatically over the past year (for reasons that PG has documented).

[deleted]
Re:IPhone 4 by ergo98 on Tuesday June 29, 2010 @09:55PM (#1473589)
I != the other person. It was a simple, obvious observation. In the same way that a writer for the right wing press isn't going to suddenly question conservative values.
Re:IPhone 4 by allwein on Tuesday June 29, 2010 @11:11PM (#1473763)
The grammar nerd in me is desperately wishing that you had written this as "The other person != me".
Re:IPhone 4 by ugh on Tuesday June 29, 2010 @10:04PM (#1473616)
My bad. My memory is really failing me.