yeah, future version of PA should had one command 'uninstall'; all linux users would use PA with joy now.

I often feared PA, and something in ALSA (I almost know zero about linux audio stack) made it a zero effort / 99% working thing that matched what I want for audio, that is a no sweat thing that just push sound. I can live without multi room networked audio, but having local audio crash randomly is too much a PITA. Feels like having lisp macros on top of VBA.

That said I wish we could find a better solution. Something between ALSA and PA. Also PA demands quality driver, IIRC Lennard told he cannot get blamed for that, it's a bit like GPUs in a way; and I wish we'd have open hardware audio chip that were simple and not lying.

I don't know why you're downvoted. One thing though: if Lennard blames the drivers, he should at least implement some fallback mechanism to use when a feature is unavailable or can't be relied on to work reliably. Honestly, if with the same drivers ALSA works fine and PA doesn't, it's hard to blame the drivers.

I think it's a bit more subtle than that. PA asks more from the hardware to do more than ALSA (sampling capabilities, and latency), if the drivers report fake numbers to ALSA it might work fine for its limited use case, while it fucks PA logic entirely.

That said a default fallback would be so good. I can't stop thinking that LP writes things for his own world and leave it there when he's "satisfied" with it; even if it means shit for the rest. Which means the issue is that he shouldn't be in charge of socially impactful components.

> I can't stop thinking that LP writes things for his own world and leave it there when he's "satisfied" with it; even if it means shit for the rest. Which means the issue is that he shouldn't be in charge of socially impactful components.

Unless you have examples of solid patches fixing these kind of problems that he rejected, this is a significantly unfair statement.

Fair point, he's not the only coder in his projects, and maybe it's unfair social response that influence me, but his projects always rub people the wrong way, even though they carry brilliant useful ideas. Also if the overall design impede fixing without too much hassle ..

He seems to suffer from massive ego. He always assumes that if his stuff is failing, it’s somehow someone else’s fault, and refuses to acknowledge fault even when evidence is presented.

At least that’s what’s been apparent to me from the things that I’ve read by him and about him.

He often has a lot of good points, but it's not enough when assuming a pivotal role in society. You cannot just be right 60% of the time, because 40% people leftover is far too much. It's saddenning for instance, PA had valueable goals, but if the design assumes hardware that doesn't exist (exagerating) then it's not a good fit for a standard audio stack.

And I'm not sure it's really ego.. I'd rate him at about 0.07geohots.