There is plenty of discussion of the signal issue, the proximity sensor issue, and the potential fragility. It doesn't gloss over them or overplay them.

Is that sufficient? This seems at least as balanced and credible as the Ars Technical review.

Not only did he find and acknowledge a flaw, but he filed an issue on it.

It seems likely to me that these won’t be obvious until people have had more time to use the device. Which flaws should he have acknowledged?