Re:A massive volcano that scientists can't find
by agucho on Sunday July 09, 2017 @05:43AM
(#14729040)
Mighty interesting, sure. Still, I can't stand these awe-driven narratives. The formula is getting old and in the jumping from one wow to the next a lot of the real questions and facts are left half-explained. And as somebody already pointed out, the units... football fields, Hiroshima bombs and the area of California... they should standardize those already, right? Journalists could use abbreviations and the rest of us would get to write unit converters when learning a new programming language.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A massive volcano that scientists can't find
by dTal on Sunday July 09, 2017 @09:58PM
(#14732890)
Well, you know the trouble with standards...
https://www.theregister.co.uk/Design/page/reg-standards-conv...
Re:A massive volcano that scientists can't find
by mirimir on Sunday July 09, 2017 @05:54AM
(#14729055)
Right. I could probably rewrite it in about five sentences, plus footnotes ;)
Re:A massive volcano that scientists can't find
by pokemongoaway on Sunday July 09, 2017 @06:28AM
(#14729134)
Exactly! When future historians read back at writing from our time period - if it is still around - then how do you think they'll characterize it?