Re:Judge rules Utah law banning undercover farm filming is u...
by URSpider94 on Saturday July 08, 2017 @02:00AM
(#14724317)
When that five horrible minutes involves feeding live male chicks into a grinder, or spraying water up the nose of a downer cow to get it to go to slaughter (and be made into people food)? Yes, I think there's a legitimate public right to know.
Re:Judge rules Utah law banning undercover farm filming is u...
by kibwen on Saturday July 08, 2017 @01:39AM
(#14724249)
> the most embarrassing, context-free 5 minutes they could find of your job
The five minutes a day I spend trying to quit vim?
Re:Judge rules Utah law banning undercover farm filming is u...
by arthur_trudeau on Saturday July 08, 2017 @01:41AM
(#14724260)
When your job is, eg, slaughtering pigs, or swearing at engines, or dealing with abusive customers (or abusive editors I suppose), you might reconsider.
Re:Judge rules Utah law banning undercover farm filming is u...
by colanderman on Saturday July 08, 2017 @01:57AM
(#14724312)
Swearing at engines isn't illegal or morally reprehensible. Animal abuse is.
[dead]
Re:Judge rules Utah law banning undercover farm filming is u...
by asciimo on Saturday July 08, 2017 @05:08AM
(#14724715)
I don't understand your point. No human lives would be endangered by sparing the lives of other animals.
Re:Judge rules Utah law banning undercover farm filming is u...
by newscracker on Saturday July 08, 2017 @02:59AM
(#14724469)
People wouldn't be as upset if this were just "5 minutes" or just happening at one place. It's systemic and widespread, and for more people to know that it is indeed systemic and widespread, more investigation and exposés are required (even if the abusing parties don't like it). Otherwise people just brush it off saying "this is one isolated instance", "it's just two different places" and all sorts of excuses to avoid confronting the truth.
These environments, or disrupting their operations because you're trying to get a sweet shot, can be legitimately dangerous. Discouraging people from trespassing in search of publicity could certainly constitute a rational basis for such a law.
It's a neat trick to ask what possible justification there could be and then downvote the explanation.