Re:NY hotels trying to outlaw short-term home sublets (i.e. ...
by pavel_lishin on Tuesday June 29, 2010 @11:50PM
(#1473846)
> It was a way better experience than using a hotel. He actually double booked the room for a couple of the days, so he gave us a different apartment in Manhattan for those days.
How good would the experience be if he didn't have that second apartment?
Re:NY hotels trying to outlaw short-term home sublets (i.e. ...
by natrius on Wednesday June 30, 2010 @07:58AM
(#1474551)
It would've sucked. The double booking was an accident as far as I could tell, and that's not unheard of at normal hotels. I wasn't counting the chance of getting to stay in multiple places as a benefit of short-term rentals. It's negligible.
It was a way better experience than using a hotel. He actually double booked the room for a couple of the days, so he gave us a different apartment in Manhattan for those days. We ended up getting to experience more neighborhoods on a deeper level than we would have otherwise. You could always split a trip between two normal hotels, but they usually aren't in actual neighborhoods.
Making this illegal is dumb, and it reeks of wholesale purchasing of legislation.