Re:Dear Canon: Time to add communications to your low-end ca...
by ojbyrne on Tuesday June 29, 2010 @09:04AM
(#1471217)
But they probably do want "post to flickr/smugmug/etc."
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Dear Canon: Time to add communications to your low-end ca...
by olefoo on Tuesday June 29, 2010 @09:17AM
(#1471261)
They want that in their editing software, but even if high-end cameras start getting a screen as good as the iPhone4; most pros are very careful about what they make public.
Re:Dear Canon: Time to add communications to your low-end ca...
by axod on Tuesday June 29, 2010 @09:15AM
(#1471251)
I disagree. I certainly wouldn't buy a serious camera that tied me to any one online service. Definitely put that stuff on cheapy kids cameras, but not on better cameras.
Re:Dear Canon: Time to add communications to your low-end ca...
by ojbyrne on Tuesday June 29, 2010 @10:13AM
(#1471439)
Certainly if you're "tied" to it. But why not be able to upload a picture quickly, while still having it left on the memory card?
Re:Dear Canon: Time to add communications to your low-end ca...
by axod on Tuesday June 29, 2010 @11:49AM
(#1471772)
isn't that what the eye-fi card thingy does?
I just don't want extra addon-service crap in my camera.