News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The third thumb by sluggg on Thursday July 06, 2017 @12:53PM (#14711816)
what if I want two? I can't have two third thumbs
Re:The third thumb by hellbanner on Thursday July 06, 2017 @01:08PM (#14711934)
Silly puns don't add to the conversation here.

A better comment would be addressing vulnerabilities or interference issues in bluetooth.

Re:The third thumb by saghm on Thursday July 06, 2017 @03:45PM (#14713298)
Regardless of the value of the pun, telling people that they should comment about certain things instead of actually commenting those things yourself feels a bit strange. If you want to have a conversation about the security implications, why not just start it yourself?
Re:The third thumb by sluggg on Thursday July 06, 2017 @04:57PM (#14713894)
my question still remains... is it, or could it be, designed so that I could wear two. If so, then the name itself is confusing and should be changed.

Also, I encourage you to go make your own "better" comment and start the discussion you want to see.

Re:The third thumb by hellbanner on Sunday July 09, 2017 @11:33AM (#14730172)
Good point on the question, and thank you for the advice. Sorry for taking your comment the wrong way.
Re:The third thumb by woodandsteel on Thursday July 06, 2017 @04:14PM (#14713540)
I think we have here an example of Poe's law.