#1 Unintentional injuries
#2 Cancer
#3 Suicide
#4 Heart disease
#5 Chronic lower respiratory diseases
#6 Pregnancy complications
Think about which type of young patient comes to them with at minimum of 6 to 9 months of warning, so much time to prepare for the "event". Think about which type of patient can leave the hospital well with a completely normal life expectancy. Out of those #6 death options, pregnancy is the only type of event where, if you survive, you have a completely normal life & life expectancy. Given that, why wouldn't a hospital invest the resource?
That being said, it's not necessarily true - after all, if X resources would be more effective mitigating cause of death A than cause of death B, then presumably you would want to (from a utilitarian calculus) direct them to A, irrespective of whether A or B causes more deaths.
Eh, sorry if I'm missing something obvious, but isn't this true? Obviously it's best to pursue everything possible at once, but with limited resources it is optimal to hit them in order of magnitude.