Re:Amelia Earhart May Have Survived Crash-Landing, Newly Dis...
by abritinthebay on Thursday July 06, 2017 @11:09AM
(#14710965)
I agree this photo is silly but that’s not quite true - we have partial plane wreckage, of either the same or similar model of plane, and a woman’s bones (now lost).
It’s likely she crashed, and likely died on an island. The evidence is extremely suggestive. Not conclusive by any means but more than simply conjecture.
Re:Amelia Earhart May Have Survived Crash-Landing, Newly Dis...
by kafkaesq on Thursday July 06, 2017 @03:37PM
(#14713225)
a woman’s bones (now lost).
I thought the consensus was that they turned out to be a man's bones (and not even matching Earhart's proportions). Which may explain why they ended up getting "lost".
That leaves us with just that patch of aluminum, of unconfirmed origin. I would call that kind of an indication "mildly" rather than "extremely" suggestive.
Re:Amelia Earhart May Have Survived Crash-Landing, Newly Dis...
by abritinthebay on Thursday July 06, 2017 @03:46PM
(#14713304)
No, that was the initial conclusion but later analysis (of the measurements) put it within the (non typical) range of her.. remember- it was partial remains too.
They also found a woman’s shoe and a sextant with a serial in the range that would have been issued to her.
It’s not conclusive at all, I agree, but it’s got vastly more evidence (that is otherwise not easily explainable) than any other theory.
"Conclusive evidence" would be plane wreckage, fragments of her personal belongings (or those of other occupants) and the like. Or even statements from witnesses about a plane going down that matched the Electra's description.
But we have none of that. The only thing we have "conclusive" evidence for is that at some point she dropped out of radio contact, and was probably low on fuel.