News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NASA Revives Plan to Put Nuclear Reactors on Mars by Robotbeat on Wednesday July 05, 2017 @02:07PM (#14704788)
ISS solar arrays produce more power than that, plus they're literally from the 1980s. We have far more efficient and lower mass designs.

You should use Ultraflex or similar as a standard. Instead of the ~7W/kg you used for ISS arrays at Earth orbit, you'll get ~150W/kg at Earth orbit:

https://www.orbitalatk.com/space-systems/space-components/so...

We have commercial satellites that also use much cheaper arrays with much higher efficiency.

Using 30 year old solar tech with a very mass-inefficient design is putting your thumb on the scale of such a comparison.

I like kilopower and am a fan (it really helps for super deep space missions that currently have to rely on the tiny amount of Plutonium-238 we have and can make), but we're going to use a LOT of solar power on Mars just as we do today.

Re:NASA Revives Plan to Put Nuclear Reactors on Mars by davedx on Thursday July 06, 2017 @04:13AM (#14708867)
Wow, nice, thanks for the information. I find this stuff fascinating! Do you have any further reading?