Re:Underhanded Solidity Coding Contest
by saghm on Monday July 03, 2017 @01:55PM
(#14690141)
I think you might be misinterpreting what GP is saying by trimming the end of the quote; they're not saying that making something easier to read makes it harder to write, they're saying that making something easy to read but hard to write is a worthy goal.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Also, I think "hard to write" is meant as "require that critical or dangerous details are written explicitly; if a feature adds convenience for writing at the expense of reading, it should be avoided". (Type inference, overloads and reflection come to mind)
I think (hope) that no one is advocating making a language verbose or complex for it's own sake.
Re:Underhanded Solidity Coding Contest
by kronos29296 on Tuesday July 04, 2017 @04:15AM
(#14694353)
Like Rust? Rust does most of those things wrt explicit dangerous behaviour.
Exactly.