If you aren't factoring that in to your comment, it comes off a little like you are trolling or being facile.
Accepting the literal truth of the resurrection of Jesus Christ as a point of faith is arguably the only working definition of a "Christian."
If you have faith, why do you need to have churches?
why don't churches start "red teams" to debate the Word. so that people can be reassured by the certainty of the teachings to bolster faith?
I don't feel like digging up references for this right now. Follow some fundamentalist Christians on FB if you want to have a look into a very different reality tunnel.
It's simply that if you believe more or less in the texts but don't have faith in that one fact, your beliefs are more in line with Jews or Muslims who believe Jesus was a prophet, but aren't so sold on the literal resurrection/savior/son of god/messiah aspect.
Because the point of belief is not finding truth (Doubt it ever was), but finding peace, comfort and may be a sense of community and togetherness..
why the double standard?