Re:Ti NE555 – real vs fake: weekend die-shot
by monocasa on Monday July 03, 2017 @01:09AM
(#14685970)
555s are chips that sort of fundamentally sit of the boundary between analog and digital. Their analog properties matter in most cases.
Re:Ti NE555 – real vs fake: weekend die-shot
by zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC on Monday July 03, 2017 @07:56AM
(#14687586)
So, are you saying that if I suspect that I am being defrauded, it's not fraud anymore?
Re:Ti NE555 – real vs fake: weekend die-shot
by em3rgent0rdr on Tuesday July 04, 2017 @04:02AM
(#14694303)
Not suspect. But know.
Re:Ti NE555 – real vs fake: weekend die-shot
by zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC on Tuesday July 04, 2017 @07:46AM
(#14695248)
So, how do I know (and not just suspect) that a particular seller is not selling TI parts?
Re:Ti NE555 – real vs fake: weekend die-shot
by em3rgent0rdr on Wednesday July 05, 2017 @03:30PM
(#14705440)
Well there is no way to verify that the device was manufactured by TI. That itself doesn't let you know as a matter of truth, but that does let you as a smart shopper know that it is likely fake. You can make an inference since (A) you are buying on a website that is known for providing a means for counterfeit goods from China, and (B) the seller is located in China and has no info that reliably identifies it as a seller of genuine parts.
I guess what triggered me to write my first comment was the fact someone buying a "TI" something chip from eBay when it lists "China" as the seller's location and with a seller's name other than something easily verified to be TI, then it seems there is no pretense that the thing being sold is genuine TI. But the word "fake" holds the connotation that there is some deception going on. So that is why I don't think fake is the most appropriate word. I just hear that word used too much to disparage chinese made derivative imitation products. Someone who knows they don't need the noise levels and voltages tolerances can be perfectly happy and even benefit by using these instead of the more expensive genuine TI.