Of course, we know that our theoretical model break down before that (since we don't have an experimetally verified theory of gravity compatible with quantum mechanics). Physicist that work in the field (and I used to be one of them) are well aware that we cannot extrapolate past the regions of validity of our theories and no one claim that there was indeed a singular point ("Big Bang") as mentioned in descriptions aimed at a non-expert audience.
http://www.hawking.org.uk/the-beginning-of-time.html
I even saw that recently Stephen Hawking started theorizing that the "Big Bang" was like a black hole. And other physicists weigh in:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/BlackHoles/...
Look at this wikipedia article. Someone must be writing it?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initial_singularity
In fact there are some contradictions between Quantum Mechanics and an actual big bang:
https://m.phys.org/news/2015-02-big-quantum-equation-univers...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang_nucleosynthesis
Some relatively small effects of so-called "tired-light" scenario could likely be accommodated, but it would not change the main picture.