I'd even complained about the reps being separate, pointing out how this gave the power on meta to people who didn't even necessarily contribute on the main site. A bunch of high meta-rep users descended, simultaneously shooting down the idea of merging the reps while admitting that the main reason they like the status quo was because they didn't want to lose their precious karma. I was petty surprised when SO eventually fixed this, but it's kind of too little, too late. I don't bother with meta anymore despite now having a high rep on it. Too many bad memories.
Anyway, I find it sad that they are losing some possibly useful feedback in the name of self-adoration. And this particularly because SE is a fantastic source of knowledge, just reading the Hot Topics made me learn about subjects I did have never looked at.
The SO Meta community is such a bunch of bullies that I now hardly go there (even though I recently found two bugs which I did not bother to post). In contrast, the regular channels are pragmatically helpful (pragmatically because you still need to do some God offering sacrifices (called "what effort have you put in the question" and suffer some psychotic down voters). It is interesting to see that both populations are composed from the same individuals who seem to have a personality flip when switching channels.
I would be interested someday to learn about the dynamics of such groups. There are plenty of places on Internet populated by mentally deranged participants (cowards hiding behind Internet) but the SE Meta ones are, I belive, more educated / intelligent in average and, sometimes, more traceable.