News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Is It So Hard to Study Marijuana? by grenoire on Sunday July 02, 2017 @12:20PM (#14683129)
I am yet to see a study that has compared one-pack-a-day smokers of tobacco and marijuana. Effects of cigarettes become significant after one pack year, and I don't know if you can even find participants for a test, who smoke marijuana in equivalent weight.

Until then, "marijuana is better than tobacco" is simply a bullshit statement. Smoke less cigarettes and your risk of cancer and respiratory diseases will of course be lower!

Re:Why Is It So Hard to Study Marijuana? by bluejekyll on Sunday July 02, 2017 @12:38PM (#14683181)
http://www.esquire.com/lifestyle/health/news/a52634/marijuan...

That sources this study:

http://nationalacademies.org/hmd/~/media/Files/Report%20File...

That study states that "there is moderate evidence that there is no statistical evidence for ... lung cancer".

Now most studies in this area make mention of the fact that even for heavy marijuana smokers, they never smoke as much as a pack a day cigarette smoker. Which is to say, that even though there is more tar in the smoke of marijuana per gram, people don't smoke as much because they don't feel a need to.

That does not mean it is safe, but there is no evidence that it's as bad a cigarettes.