Re:Amazon Web Services: Clouded by Duplicate Content
by rlpb on Monday June 28, 2010 @11:13AM
(#1468171)
If accessing your web server via .amazonaws.com does not make sense for you, why not just block (whether 403 or 404) all HTTP requests with a Host: *.amazonaws.com header, rather than messing around with rewrites and robots.txt?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon Web Services: Clouded by Duplicate Content
by ddemchuk on Monday June 28, 2010 @11:15AM
(#1468180)
Because once that content is indexed, you can receive a negative effect from Google by mass 403-ing a huge amount of content
Re:Amazon Web Services: Clouded by Duplicate Content
by rlpb on Monday June 28, 2010 @11:51AM
(#1468314)
301 then it if this applies to you. It's still the same solution.
Re:Amazon Web Services: Clouded by Duplicate Content
by ddemchuk on Monday June 28, 2010 @06:59PM
(#1469740)
No its not. Google has said that in situations like this, use a 301 redirect to properly tell them where the actual content is located. Using a 403 is an error page that will tell the spiders that that page doesn't exist anymore, and that can have a negative impact on your rankings