News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why We Chose Typescript by fny on Saturday July 01, 2017 @09:41AM (#14677062)
I've tried in Rust, and it requires a return definition, as do most mainstream functional languages.

Also, mainstream functional languages aren't truly mainstream: I'd struggle to find devs who could help me in consulting gigs.

Re:Why We Chose Typescript by mrkgnao on Saturday July 01, 2017 @12:51PM (#14677827)
I'm pretty sure that's just "administrative" and imposed by the syntax (e.g. think Java/C++ function declaration syntax), instead of being something the compiler can't infer. Thanks for clearing this up, though.
Re:Why We Chose Typescript by steveklabnik on Saturday July 01, 2017 @01:10PM (#14677903)
It was a design decision, yes. We could infer them if we wanted to, but we don't.
Re:Why We Chose Typescript by igouy on Saturday July 01, 2017 @12:40PM (#14677786)

    let rec factorial n = 
        if n = 0 || n = 1 then 1 
        else n * factorial (n - 1)
F#
Re:Why We Chose Typescript by mrkgnao on Saturday July 01, 2017 @12:50PM (#14677820)
Haskell:

  factorial n =
    if n < 2 
      then 1
      else n * factorial (n - 1)
I think the OCaml version will look almost exactly like the F# one.