News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why We Chose Typescript by nine_k on Friday June 30, 2017 @08:29PM (#14674501)
Smart answer successful founders of Wikipedia took an existing wiki engine. Their aspirations were not in the software development area.

Highly dynamic languages like Python or PHP or Perl are easy to start with, so they're great for prototypes. Then either a serious rewrite follows, using a statically checked language, or scaffolding is erected to continue to make do with the dynamic code. Microservices help!

Re:Why We Chose Typescript by bayesian_horse on Saturday July 01, 2017 @05:12AM (#14676200)
Erm, so splitting big Python projects into microservices is proof that dynamic typing is unsustainable?
Re:Why We Chose Typescript by nine_k on Sunday July 02, 2017 @11:08AM (#14682814)
No; but a single microservice is a smaller code base that a large monolith, so the problem . Also, you normally control the microservice's interface more strictly, and change it less often, and care about compatibility and versioning more, than for a typical internal API.