News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Photobucket limits displaying of images on external sites... by zeveb on Friday June 30, 2017 @08:45AM (#14670354)
I consider imgur a poor choice because it doesn't work with JavaScript disabled (dunno how Drive, Dropbox or Photobucket do, just that imgur breaks). It's in the business of serving JPEGs and HTML containing <img> tags pointing to JPEGs; to break that HTML such that those JPEGs don't serve is failing to deliver on its core business.

Sure, use JavaScript to implement infinite scrolling or on-demand loading, but fall back to usable pure HTML.

Re:Photobucket limits displaying of images on external sites... by cerved on Friday June 30, 2017 @09:43AM (#14670625)
I'm confused. Which part doesn't work without js, the hosting or uploading?