News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:My Failed Attempt at Engineering Love by dwaltrip on Thursday June 29, 2017 @01:52PM (#14665352)
Unless the majority of people you know are gay, that isn't possible.

For each hetero man you know following strategy 2, by definition, there is a corresponding woman (his partner).

And vice versa with the women who are using strategy 1.

Re:My Failed Attempt at Engineering Love by mattnewport on Thursday June 29, 2017 @02:04PM (#14665468)
Not true. It's perfectly possible you have a scenario where for example the top 10% of men date 100s of women, the bottom 50% date 3 or fewer women and women have a much more even distribution and date an average much higher than 3. These numbers are just an example but in reality I think something a bit like this situation does actually exist.
Re:My Failed Attempt at Engineering Love by dwaltrip on Monday July 10, 2017 @02:04PM (#14738254)
Sorry, forgot about this post. It seems you are likely right... (my brain is feeling a bit foggy on this one right now). I can see what sort of asymmetric distribution you are talking about. This must have been studied at some point -- it would be interesting to see some hard numbers.

Anyways, thanks for the correction.

Re:My Failed Attempt at Engineering Love by tpeo on Thursday June 29, 2017 @02:10PM (#14665532)
I don't understand. What's the relationship between one person's dating strategy and another person's dating strategy? What's about gays?

Also, I don't see why, for instance, there wouldn't be something like a population where everyone only tries to date as many people as possible. Are you assuming that people wouldn't ever date the same person again?