News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is the business of scientific publishing bad for science? by lordnacho on Thursday June 29, 2017 @02:53AM (#14661302)
There's an army of people on Fiverr and the like who would make your papers look fine, for very little money.
Re:Is the business of scientific publishing bad for science? by Fomite on Thursday June 29, 2017 @04:25AM (#14661622)
A few thoughts:

1. They don't have a standard journal style. I want my Lancet paper to look like a Lancet paper, not just "be fine".

2. I'd have to find them. The journals do it for me automatically on submission.

3. For a lab just starting out, there is no such thing as "very little money".

Re:Is the business of scientific publishing bad for science? by lordnacho on Thursday June 29, 2017 @05:28AM (#14661852)
1. They can make it look however you like. They don't because they're not allowed into that particular market.

2. They're all over those sites. And the journal takes a lot, apparently.

3. A few tens of dollars? How many papers does an academic do in a year? They really can't afford a few hundred bucks?

I think if the publishers weren't in their near-monopoly position, money could be found for this. Heck, someone will probably write an AI that does the formatting in the right style soon.