Re:Internal documents shed light on the guidelines that Face...
by WaxProlix on Wednesday June 28, 2017 @09:44PM
(#14660134)
I'd love to see how quickly an ISIS recruitment rally would be squashed in any city in the USA with nobody shedding a tear over the abuse of freedom of speech.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Internal documents shed light on the guidelines that Face...
by JBReefer on Thursday June 29, 2017 @01:59AM
(#14661102)
The ACLU famously defended the KKK's right to have parades/rallies. Both have a pretty good history of killing Americans and saying horrible things.
This country exists because of freedom of speech and press, and it really does matter to us.
Re:Internal documents shed light on the guidelines that Face...
by vkou on Thursday June 29, 2017 @02:58AM
(#14661320)
America has historically cared very little for the Americans the KKK killed. Judging by the commentary that arises whenever BLM is mentioned, it still doesn't.
Re:Internal documents shed light on the guidelines that Face...
by watwut on Thursday June 29, 2017 @04:21AM
(#14661615)
To be fair to ACLU, they have good record defending speech no matter who talk. The did care about civil rights groups speech as much as KKK.
Re:Internal documents shed light on the guidelines that Face...
by eehee on Thursday June 29, 2017 @03:13AM
(#14661388)
When BLM is mentioned, I often see people criticize their methods, the underlying ideology of some members and their claims to truth. I have never seen anyone not care about black people being killed.
There is, of course, a possibility that I'm living in an opaque filter bubble and that the racist hordes are just outside. If I am, please pop that bubble and show me the truth.
Re:Internal documents shed light on the guidelines that Face...
by teacup50 on Wednesday June 28, 2017 @10:57PM
(#14660435)
"Those Demanding Free Speech Limits to Fight ISIS Pose a Greater Threat to U.S. Than ISIS" (The Intercept):
https://theintercept.com/2015/12/29/those-demanding-free-spe...