(Sorry don't have the full text for the others)
And your 'worst one of all' is a joke of a paper. Its a review and begs the question that glycophosphate is substituting an amino acid.
Its presupposition that ” Glyphosate is a glycine molecule with a methyl-phosphonyl group bound to the nitrogen atom. As an analogue of glycine, it can be expected to displace glycine at random points in the protein synthesis process, with unknown consequences.
Demonstrates a clear lack of understanding of the specificity of the ribosomes and enzymes/proteins in general.
Of course they have no actual evidence - say isolating glycophosphate substituted proteins? Fairly easy to do as normal proteins do not contain phosphorous, or it could be via C13 labeling of the what would be the glycine residue.
To say nothing that its quoting studies dosing the equivalent (10mg+/kg) of having a person do literal shots of herbicide.
Everything (except e-caprolactam, go figure) causes cancer, and most everything will kill you if you have enough of it. Hell the IARC has glycophosphate in the same category as red meat and drinking beverages warmer than 65C. They've also classified cell phones as 'possibly carcinogenic to humans'. http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf
There isn't a single piece of evidence in that paper, the authors simply assume that glyphosate can subvert one of the most important mechanisms in the cell and change any protein that contains glycine.
What kills this hypothesis entirely is that glyphosate is a glycine with a modification on the amino group. That is the part of the amino acid that is used to make the connection to the previous one in a protein. This kind of modification makes it impossible for it to be incorporated into a protein by a peptide bond.
The journal also does not seem trustworthy, it doesn't seem to be indexed in Pubmed, which is a very, very bad sign. Why would a scientist publish in a journal that none of their colleagues could easily find? In this area of science, every journal worth reading (and some more) are indexed in Pubmed. It also seems to only publish ~3 papers per issue.
And the worst one of all: https://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/2016/Glyphosate_V_glycin...
So yeah, not only does it cause cancer, it causes a wide range of diseases: literally any one that can be caused by protein misassembly in ways that the body can't easily clear the protein (or if it does, the glyphosate can end up being reused instead of flushed out of your body) can be linked to this.
So, in around 5 years, if they come out with a study that Autism is caused by, or greatly enhanced by, glyphosate exposure in utero or during nursing (glyphosate concentrations are extremely high in breast milk in mothers exposed to the chemical), I will not be surprised whatsoever.