So to rephrase my question(s), "Who wins in the global context? Whichever can/will enforce the most?", the answer is yes? "This is enforceable worldwide until you show that it isn't" doesn't seem sane to me. It's backwards. You should not have to provide somewhere where a ruling is illegal to prevent that ruling from applying worldwide.

So a government can censor a website worldwide because the company can't provide a law saying it's illegal for them to self-censor?