Actually you can, the Secret Service will investigate to determine if it a "True Threat" but the number of people actually prosecuted for threatening the president is exceeding low, don't confuse the Secret Service Investigation with a suppression of speech.
>Most people would call demanding the right to incite hate deeply regressive, and indeed, it is the most regressive who need that protection.
Speech that is popular and not offensive does not need protection int eh first place
Please stop with that
https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/11/its-tim...
>or threaten the president,
Actually you can, the Secret Service will investigate to determine if it a "True Threat" but the number of people actually prosecuted for threatening the president is exceeding low, don't confuse the Secret Service Investigation with a suppression of speech.
>Most people would call demanding the right to incite hate deeply regressive, and indeed, it is the most regressive who need that protection.
Speech that is popular and not offensive does not need protection int eh first place