News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Zillow's second letter about McMansion Hell is still wrong by autokad on Wednesday June 28, 2017 @03:44PM (#14657579)
additional to your points, i have to agree with you as well. I would be mortified if a blogger was using an image of my house for ridicule and condemnation in order to feed their paycheck.
Re:Zillow's second letter about McMansion Hell is still wrong by jessaustin on Wednesday June 28, 2017 @04:05PM (#14657763)
Mortified enough to sell/demolish it and buy/build a smaller more tasteful one? [EDIT:] b^)
Re:Zillow's second letter about McMansion Hell is still wrong by autokad on Wednesday June 28, 2017 @04:42PM (#14658171)
wow, I dont know what to say about your worldview on that one.

seriously get out of your keyboard rage and ask yourself if you or someone you cared about couldnt sell your/their house because a blogger was making money by degrading it. What if the place gets vandalized due to this activity?

hate is hate. there is no 'good' hate.

Re:Zillow's second letter about McMansion Hell is still wrong by jessaustin on Wednesday June 28, 2017 @04:57PM (#14658323)
Rage? Hate? Not here dude. Just asking a question. It's really unhealthy for humans and society to be so wrapped up in the honor or respect (or whatever this is) of houses. These houses themselves are sort of bad for their inhabitants and communities. Only you can change you.

Besides, your hypothetical dangers have literally never happened.

Re:Zillow's second letter about McMansion Hell is still wrong by plink on Wednesday June 28, 2017 @05:26PM (#14658610)
What if Godzilla were to read the blog and decide that house was a good landing place for his foot? So what.