Re:Zillow's second letter about McMansion Hell is still wrong
by ewanm89 on Wednesday June 28, 2017 @03:35PM
(#14657495)
My reply would probably be something like this, after checking it with a copyright lawyer:
Dear whomever it may concern at Zillow group,
As you do not have rights to the images are you authorised on behalf of the rights owners to issue DMCA take-down requests under title 17 of the United States Code under penalty of perjury?
Should this be the case I suggest you read Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., 801 F.3d 1126 (2015) in the 9th circuit which has just been refused certioari in the US Supreme Court (2017-06-19).
If you wish to continue this matter please submit a properly worded DMCA take down request.
Regards, ....
P.S. If you do continue this matter you obviously didn't read Lenz Vs. Universal and therefore I'll see you in court.
Dear whomever it may concern at Zillow group,
As you do not have rights to the images are you authorised on behalf of the rights owners to issue DMCA take-down requests under title 17 of the United States Code under penalty of perjury?
Should this be the case I suggest you read Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., 801 F.3d 1126 (2015) in the 9th circuit which has just been refused certioari in the US Supreme Court (2017-06-19).
If you wish to continue this matter please submit a properly worded DMCA take down request.
Regards, ....
P.S. If you do continue this matter you obviously didn't read Lenz Vs. Universal and therefore I'll see you in court.