Re:Ask HN: If your company cares about security, why does it...
by sgehly on Wednesday June 28, 2017 @01:08PM
(#14655942)
and what about if your network is compromised? For most small-medium businesses, that's more likely than Slack being compromised.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: If your company cares about security, why does it...
by linkregister on Wednesday June 28, 2017 @01:10PM
(#14655980)
Slack already had a public compromise. Most small businesses haven't been publicly compromised.
I'm not saying it's safer to self-host. There are a ton of foot-guns with operating your own IRC server.
Re:Ask HN: If your company cares about security, why does it...
by sgehly on Wednesday June 28, 2017 @01:17PM
(#14656054)
It mostly depends on if you're a target. I must have missed when Slack was compromised, but I'm willing to take the risk of Slack being hacked, as I'm not a target. Im a fan of the methodology that bigger company = more secure, although that's obviously not always the case.
Re:Ask HN: If your company cares about security, why does it...
by fao_ on Wednesday June 28, 2017 @01:24PM
(#14656137)
That said, you bypass a ton of those foot-guns if you just stick everything behind a corporate VPN with 2FA and the appropriate security. As long as the VPN is secure, everything behind it is secure.
Re:Ask HN: If your company cares about security, why does it...
by fweespeech on Wednesday June 28, 2017 @01:26PM
(#14656157)
> and what about if your network is compromised? For most small-medium businesses, that's more likely than Slack being compromised.
If your network and/or workstations are compromised, it is _over anyway_ because they have all your data. This is one of those situations where you are saying "What if they decapitated me? Slack might still be secure."
I mean, technically, you are correct but it isn't relevant because you are dead.
If you think such a business can survive a pentest from an employee workstation...XD