Re:Google's response to the European Commission fine
by andrepd on Tuesday June 27, 2017 @11:45AM
(#14646457)
I can't believe I'm reading this. I'm gonna suggest you read that again. I can't believe you can be that naive. "Trust corporations' PR because they wouldn't do such a thing as lie", that's some neat stuff. x) Besides, there's this something called burden of proof?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google's response to the European Commission fine
by jimmywanger on Tuesday June 27, 2017 @05:23PM
(#14649586)
> "Trust corporations' PR because they wouldn't do such a thing as lie", that's some neat stuff. x) Besides, there's this something called burden of proof?
I suggest you read your own post again. Project much? Google's PR statement is somewhat based in fact. I'm saying that I generally believe public statements made that are decently substantiated.
When you're the one saying that I'm naive or just gaping in disbelief, the burden of proof is on YOU to give reasons why the statements are at fault and why their reasoning is wrong. This is truly projecting at its finest.
Re:Google's response to the European Commission fine
by skinnymuch on Tuesday July 11, 2017 @12:17AM
(#14741545)
No. Google put a claim up. They have to back it up. Not the person questioning it. That would make no sense. So either you or Google need to back yourselves up.