Isn't that practically one of the defining characteristics of Frank Lloyd Wright's houses?
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/3a/44/84/3a4484bdb...
http://media.architecturaldigest.com/photos/56cb8425cd3bcb32...
http://historylists.org/images/nathan-g-moore-house.jpg
https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/7024761/El...
https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/7025319/Pe...
http://midcenturyhome.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Frank-L...
http://kentuckknob.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Kentuck_Sp...
Consistent roofline, consistently repeated window motif, re-use of the horizontal stonework for the house, the exterior wall, and the chimneys.
The drawback of his Usonian houses is that the ceiling height is ridiculous by 2017 standards. At 6'3", I have to duck in several of the rooms, much less the doorways. Oof.
https://imgs.6sqft.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/07115505/f...
http://media.architecturaldigest.com/photos/57571c84e8428148...
In the one you pointed out, the question arises: "Which part is the actual house?" It has a feeling of "someone stuck on this extra part here, this stairwell here, ..." particularly with the mix of the stone and stucco'd/painted exterior, the multiple incoherent roof angles, and the inconsistent Z-depth of the front of the house.
With some architecture, the more you look at it, the more it grows on you. With the picture you posted, at first glance, I had the same reaction you did -- but after I really looked at it for a while, it started to bug the heck out of me. Kind of the same thing that happens after listening to too much auto-tuned music. The effect is cool the first time you hear it, but after a while, ...