Re:By installing NAT, MIT stifles innovation
by extra88 on Monday June 26, 2017 @06:02PM
(#14640759)
Creating seat belts is innovation. Creating regulation requiring cars to have them and passing laws that people have to use them is not innovative.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:By installing NAT, MIT stifles innovation
by saidajigumi on Tuesday June 27, 2017 @02:51PM
(#14648136)
Quoth the parent to my post (emphasis mine):
> Forcing people to use anything is never a good way to promote innovation.
You're arguing against a straw man. This is about the promotion of innovation. Yes, seat belts were innovative, and left to their own course were going nowhere. Some innovations face adoption challenges that go beyond the mere "meh" of "non-consumption". They are major social battles, requiring large and multi-faceted campaigns to succeed and overcome social inertia. E.g. for seat belts: regulations on manufacturing, laws and law enforcement campaigns, public education and marketing, etc.