News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:By installing NAT, MIT stifles innovation by lloeki on Monday June 26, 2017 @02:06PM (#14638924)
The situation over here is quite the opposite, if you're using the regular plans of the major ISPs (which is most people) you have IPv6.

Free ADSL, which has been providing IPv6 access via 6rd for like 10 years, even started deployment of IPv6 only DSLAMs in April.

This makes the absence of IPv6 on major platforms and sites very visible. There is no excuse not to have IPv6 today, especially for market leaders, and its lack thereof is definitely a showstopper WRT services we choose to use.

As an anecdote, we have seen some constantly increasing traffic over IPv6 in our logs, and our customers are definitely not on the technical side, very far from it.

http://m.universfreebox.com/article/38742/Free-deploie-ses-p...

Re:By installing NAT, MIT stifles innovation by compuguy on Monday June 26, 2017 @03:34PM (#14639605)
Here in the US, Verizon wireline has been dragging their feet on a IPv6 deployment for years.