Re:Efficient music players remain elusive
by CuriouslyC on Monday June 26, 2017 @09:07AM
(#14636443)
The actual amount of data in that 20GB that needs to be handled by the player for that playlist is probably on the order of a few bytes bytes per MB. If we round up to 100 bytes per MB, you're still only looking at a few MB of metadata.
Re:Efficient music players remain elusive
by kogepathic on Monday June 26, 2017 @08:56AM
(#14636368)
> If you find a DB that can cope with 20GB without sweating much, give me a shout! ;) You might become rich if you make one, too!
Oh, this one will be easy! But I'm warning you now, you'll need 24GB of RAM to run it ;-)
If you find a DB that can cope with 20GB without sweating much, give me a shout! ;) You might become rich if you make one, too!