I'm no lawyer, but I highly doubt it'll hold. And buying Linux from them could be very toxic as "GPL violation" => "termination of license" -- and I'm not sure how you go about getting a new license :)
But punishing people for exercising their rights, is quite similar to placing restrictions on said rights.
I'm no lawyer, but you generally can't out-smart the law :)
IANAL either, in case that wasn't obvious.
> You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein.
The central right granted under the GPL is, of course, the right to modify and redistribute the source. I'm not a lawyer, and I'm certain that Grsecurity could find a number of legal arguments that what they're doing is allowed (likely starting with the claim that terminating a relationship with a customer isn't legally imposing a restriction on that customer's actions), but the idea that they're in violation of the GPL isn't pulled from thin air.
Someone will have to set up an automatic snail mailer.
If they do not respect that, they are explicitly violating GPL.
I'm no lawyer, but the spirit of the law or a contract matters. You can't avoid a speeding ticket because the wheels of your car wasn't touching the road in the photo :)
Unethical, probably - illegal, probably not. The GPL dictates what you can do once code hits your hands (or binaries compiled with), it doesn't prevent companies from selling it to you or what contract they do it under.