Re:Apparently, employers are still asking for Windows 95 and...
by heyjonboy on Saturday June 26, 2010 @12:19AM
(#1463091)
Why wouldn't you just use Linux for embedded systems? Seems wasteful to use a GUI-based OS for something that will most likely be a single-purpose device.
Re:Apparently, employers are still asking for Windows 95 and...
by mahmud on Saturday June 26, 2010 @01:36AM
(#1463189)
Toolchain and development cycle. Windows 95 systems programming is trivial, and not in a good way. You can access privileged system registers and memory areas directly, until you crash your box. Once you learn how to write a VxD it's a matter of tweaking it for other purposes, since the great difficulty lies in just getting the skeleton to work.
Re:Apparently, employers are still asking for Windows 95 and...
by nitrogen on Saturday June 26, 2010 @02:51AM
(#1463273)
Linux is mostly that easy, in my experience. It may be easier, since there are probably already drivers for most of your chips. At any rate, once you have a skeleton kernel mode driver, it's just a matter of tweaking it for other purposes.
As a result, some of the old chipsets can only be programmed using old software which only works on 95. For a business that does embedded programming it isn't feasible to switch to a new chipset that would require a complete code rewrite just so that they can use a newer OS.
Interestingly embedded programming is also an extremely high paying job because there aren't that many people who can do it.