News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FCC hits robocaller with agency's largest-ever fine of $120M by dennisgorelik on Sunday June 25, 2017 @01:53AM (#14628832)
How can robocaller keep the call running if party on another end ended the call?
Re:FCC hits robocaller with agency's largest-ever fine of $120M by MichaelGG on Sunday June 25, 2017 @09:34PM (#14633393)
That was my question! The issue is that the robocaller is hanging up early, because they get billed on 6 second intervals. But they pay so much more for their bad traffic that it's profitable to absorb a 6 second interval on the intermediaries end, just to avoid the short-call penalties. Yes, if they'd hold the call open themselves, instead of the middle-man, they'd get lower prices overall.

I see things like this in telecom too much. Where people are mathematically going to lose, guaranteed, but prefer a certain billing because it's easier to understand, or looks cheaper. While this is understandable for an SMB that isn't in the telecom business, I've seen big names take these same deals. And I've seen the other end: they 100% are losing a few % in doing so.