It might be puff piece, but at least it does not focus on "toxic culture forced CEO to resign". The latter story might feel good and thus be more popular, but is less likely reason for investors revolution then "they are losing money, have no plan and are overall ineffective".

It is true that former CEO personality was important for uber and different dude or lady could not achieve the same, but achievement here is losing tons of money on business that does not seem to be profitable ever. That is odd definition of winning.