News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Breitbart misrepresents research from 58 scientific paper... by Finnucane on Thursday June 22, 2017 @10:30AM (#14612471)
"Breitbart article is bullshit" is pretty much taken as read, but letting the cited authors have a Marshall McCluhan moment ("you know nothing of my work") does hav e its own satisfaction. Too bad it won't be seen by as many people.
Re:Breitbart misrepresents research from 58 scientific paper... by emvincent on Thursday June 22, 2017 @03:09PM (#14614516)
33k social media shares for the Breitbart article, 15.1k for Climate Feedback's debunk + 6k for Snopes' (http://www.snopes.com/scientific-papers-global-warming-myth/), not too bad...
Re:Breitbart misrepresents research from 58 scientific paper... by Finnucane on Thursday June 22, 2017 @06:33PM (#14615824)
Are we assuming shares is proportional to total viewing?
Re:Breitbart misrepresents research from 58 scientific paper... by sharemywin on Thursday June 22, 2017 @10:08AM (#14612310)
A majority of reviewers tagged the article as: Cherry-picking, Derogatory, Flawed reasoning, Inaccurate, Misleading.