News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction by merricksb on Thursday June 22, 2017 @08:36AM (#14611779)
The paper was heavily discussed here 7 months ago:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12893793 (309, 98 comments)

Re:IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction by erdemozg on Thursday June 22, 2017 @08:32AM (#14611754)
People don't bother to update even their home router's firmware. IoT ecosystem will be one of the biggest holes in cyber security and a heaven for black-hat hackers.
Re:IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction by Freak_NL on Thursday June 22, 2017 @08:39AM (#14611807)
Economically vendors have little to no incentive to fix this mess either, so it will haunt us for some time to come. Introducing a slew of devices that all need security updates into each household that falls for them doesn't seem all that clever.

A light bulb that can change its brightness and colour shouldn't be smart; it should be dumb as a brick and expose only those parameters that can sensibly and safely be set by a user — kind of like a normal light bulb does.

Re:IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction by kbart on Thursday June 22, 2017 @09:04AM (#14611913)
"IoT ecosystem will be one of the biggest holes in cyber security and a heaven for black-hat hackers."

I think you meant "is" here.

Re:IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction by erdemozg on Thursday June 22, 2017 @09:27AM (#14612052)
Haha, I was in dilemma. But since most people are not aware of it, I chose the future tense. But you are right, it is already.
Re:IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction by digi_owl on Thursday June 22, 2017 @08:37AM (#14611781)
1. shit brick easily.

2. vendors mix feature changes/removals and security updates.

3, better the devil you know...

Re:IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction by nothis on Thursday June 22, 2017 @08:28AM (#14611720)
So I was reading the headline a little more literal and got cold shivers from imagining that IoT crap spreading to actual nuclear plants.

Still scary as hell.

Re:IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction by adrianN on Thursday June 22, 2017 @08:33AM (#14611762)
Don't google IIoT.
Re:IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction by DavidKarlas on Thursday June 22, 2017 @08:39AM (#14611804)
Putting Touchlink in Zigbee was big mistake imo...

It helps(a bit) with user friendliness but throws AES security of Zigbee out the window...

I hope IKEA removes Touchlink in future: https://www1.cs.fau.de/content/zigbee-security-research Specially since IKEA uses power on-off pattern to reset bulbs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJm9YpPrGzk

Re:IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction by synctext on Thursday June 22, 2017 @08:37AM (#14611782)
tl;dr: OTA firmware update was hacked.

"Correlation Power Analysis (CPA) attack against the CCM encryption mode used to encrypt and verify firmware updates"

Fascinating work. Working direct .PDF: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b457/e4b95a70f8d1726ba70885...

Re:IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction by FrozenVoid on Thursday June 22, 2017 @08:16AM (#14611671)
Sounds like we already living in some cyberpunk dystopia. Except for people who don't buy "smart devices" of course.
Re:IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction by pulse7 on Thursday June 22, 2017 @08:29AM (#14611727)
It's getting harder every day not-to-buy "smart devices"... Try buying plain TV (without YouTube and Internet), try buying non-smart phone...
Re:IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction by eriknstr on Thursday June 22, 2017 @08:34AM (#14611767)
> Try buying plain TV (without YouTube and Internet)

If you leave the smart-TV without a network connection it'll be mostly like a plain TV.

> try buying non-smart phone

There are some feature phone Nokia models available, I use one such.

The thing I miss the most about having a smartphone is GPS and a map app. For everything else except mobile internet, which I can do without, that a smartphone would give me I have an iPod touch.

Re:IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction by digi_owl on Thursday June 22, 2017 @08:38AM (#14611796)
Not sure if it still works, but i swear my old SE featurephone had maps fetched straight from Google.
Re:IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction by kbart on Thursday June 22, 2017 @09:07AM (#14611929)
"Try buying plain TV (without YouTube and Internet), try buying non-smart phone..."

Disable data connection for both and you have "dumb" counterparts. Of course, you still pay for unnecessary features, but it's the price to pay if you value your privacy.

Re:IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction by farzadb82 on Thursday June 22, 2017 @09:48AM (#14612185)
If only it were that simple.

Unless you've physically removed or disconnected the wireless interface, there's still a chance that a firmware vulnerability could lead to your TV being hacked via a remote and/or side-channel attack similar to what was demonstrated in the article.

Re:IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction by adrianN on Thursday June 22, 2017 @08:34AM (#14611764)
Buying non-smart phones is very easy. Plain TVs are also readily available.
Re:IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction by leeoniya on Thursday June 22, 2017 @08:38AM (#14611792)
does anyone know a good Zigbee-capable smoke/co alarm listener that can be hooked up to send alert emails without relying on third-party servers? i was looking at openHAB and their Zigbee support is meh it seems :(
Re:IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction by louithethrid on Thursday June 22, 2017 @08:46AM (#14611840)
I should order some simple MOSFATS and other basic components in large numbers, get a mobile booth - an large sign reading:

Doest thy hardware has't the beshrew? Software demonic exoc'rzisms and beshrew removal! The doct'r is in.