Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,...
by greglindahl on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @01:59PM
(#14596916)
I wasn't suggesting making it so cold as to damage food. I also wasn't arguing against batteries.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,...
by PeterisP on Wednesday June 21, 2017 @08:04AM
(#14602954)
If you were suggesting a refrigerator to run the cooling in the night so much so that it'd be able to sustain a safe temperature for many hours while conserving energy in the day, then yes, you were suggesting making it so cold as to damage food - a few degrees difference isn't sufficient to achieve what you want, and if your temperature fluctuates more than 3-4 degrees then the food either gets unsafely warm or gets frozen/damaged.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,...
by greglindahl on Thursday June 22, 2017 @12:48AM
(#14610185)
I wasn't suggesting that, no.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,...
by angry_octet on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @02:05PM
(#14596967)
I was just generally arguing against the parent proposition as well.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,...
by greglindahl on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @02:20PM
(#14597093)
Well, if you're a skeptic as to how much can be saved, you might want to look at the many "smart grid" studies, because this has been a hot topic for a while and is already implemented to a small degree.