Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,...
by mikeash on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @01:52PM
(#14596850)
This seems awfully paranoid. Dryers are responsible for less than 1% of house fires in the US. If my house is typical, then my odds of experiencing a dryer fire are maybe .002% per year. A substantial portion of these happen because people don't clean their lint, so you can cut the risk even more by just not being negligent.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,...
by skybrian on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @11:57AM
(#14595625)
I think this might just be disagreement over what "unattended" means. To me, being in the same house (and not in the same room) is closer to "unattended" and perfectly normal.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,...
by euyyn on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @01:56PM
(#14596891)
The context in this conversation is leaving the drier on while sleeping at night, though.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,...
by PeterisP on Wednesday June 21, 2017 @08:08AM
(#14602979)
I see no significant difference between sleeping at night or watching TV in another room - in either case, I'd notice the dryer malfunction only by the sound of the fire alarm.
The purpose of me being in the building or nearby is to ensure a correct and timely response. If the fire brigade are called by a real person and asked to attend, they'll know it's not a false alarm.
But when I've seen the fire brigade called by automated systems? False alarms every time. And the police don't even bother to come out to a burglar alarm or car alarm going off - it's got to be confirmed as a genuine alarm by a neighbour or alarm monitoring service.