News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel discontinues Joule, Galileo, and Edison product lines by CamperBob2 on Monday June 19, 2017 @04:29PM (#14590195)
How exactly are FPGAs, a technology far more arcane and less cost-effective than GPUs, going to save Intel's hegemony? Any suggestions for further reading on that notion?
Re:Intel discontinues Joule, Galileo, and Edison product lines by banachtarski on Monday June 19, 2017 @07:50PM (#14591253)
I've programmed both FPGAs and GPUs. They are entirely different and shouldn't be compared with the exception of the small-ish class of tasks that map equally well to both (smaller than you think). FPGAs are more suitable to, say, prototype a new GPU or some other custom IC. It's more "arcane" and "less cost-effective" by definition because you are one abstraction level lower. For further reading, you really need to understand how a hardware design and manufacturing pipeline works to see why FPGAs and GPUs are so apples and oranges.
Re:Intel discontinues Joule, Galileo, and Edison product lines by astrodust on Monday June 19, 2017 @08:25PM (#14591394)
For consumers it won't really matter, but for server applications this can be profound.

If Intel can clean up the tooling for these things it could make them a lot more popular.