> but it doesn't actually say anything about how successful they were in reaching that goal.
How would measure that? To me it is simple: lots of cloud related infrastructure is written in that. So it seems successful.
How would measure that? To me it is simple: lots of cloud related infrastructure is written in that. So it seems successful.
Nowhere in that sentence do they claim the list is ordered by importance.
> Go was designed for writing production software that needs to be reliable.
That might be true, but it doesn't actually say anything about how successful they were in reaching that goal.